Honestly, I spend more time with ChatGPT than most people spend on Instagram or TikTok. It’s my go-to coworker, brainstorming partner, and sometimes, even a therapist. I test prompts, run experiments, and push ChatGPT to its limits almost every day — whether I’m on a morning run or packing school lunches. In other words, I’m a power user.
When I started exploring ChatGPT’s features, my experience was a mixed bag.
Read More: ChatGPT-5: Next-Gen AI with Advanced Features
Features that impress me:
- Text generation and summarization: It makes summarizing articles and research papers easy and readable.
- Idea brainstorming: I get creative and unique ideas instantly.
- Coding suggestions: Helpful for simple scripts and algorithms.
- Concept explanations: Makes complex topics much easier to understand.
Read More: Which AI Tool Wins in 2025 Between Claude and ChatGPT & Others
Disappointing experiences:
- Web browsing / real-time info: Sometimes I get outdated or incomplete info. Not reliable for every query.
- Complex coding / debugging: Works for simple code, but complex logic can fail. Output may be syntactically correct but logically wrong.
- Image generation (DALL·E): Generates creative images, but often doesn’t fully match the prompt. Realistic output isn’t consistent.
- Text-to-Speech / Voice: Multiple voices (Cove, Maple, Ember, Sol) are available, but none feel natural or comfortable. Pauses and tone changes don’t quite click with me.
- Fact-checking / deep knowledge: Niche topics sometimes give incomplete or outdated answers. Occasionally, confidently wrong information appears.
My personal experience with Voice:
I’ve tried all the voices, but none feel as smooth or efficient as chatting via text. Using Voice can actually slow me down — I type fast and skim content even faster, but with Voice, I have to follow the model’s pace. Sometimes I catch myself tapping my foot, thinking, “come on, just wrap it up already!”
There’s also the uncanny factor. The voices sound too polished, almost like actors reading lines. Ironically, that smoothness makes the interaction feel less human. The energy and pacing are inconsistent — either boring or over-the-top, and the pauses often feel more like interruptions than natural breaks.
Even with all these drawbacks, Voice is not a dealbreaker. I rely heavily on ChatGPT via text — drafting emails, summarizing research, building apps, planning family vacations — so the Voice feature’s flaws don’t ruin the overall experience.
Maybe that’s the point. AI voices aren’t meant to replace humans, and that’s okay. They remind me that I still value real human quirks and imperfections. AI’s purpose is to make life easier, not to mimic humans perfectly.
So yes, I use ChatGPT Voice sometimes, but it’s one feature that hasn’t completely won me over — and I’ve come to be okay with that. It reminds me that AI is a tool, not a friend.
Read Also: Grok AI vs ChatGPT vs Claude vs Gemini: Which AI Assistant Wins in 2025?
